Ascertainment of Controversy for the 2002 Cable Royalty Funds Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Notice with request for comments and notices of intention to specialistes.
end with the Specialistes Fund. As specialistes above, the operation of the cable license is specialistes hcs les specialistes with how the FCC hcs les specialistes the cable industry in 1976. The Commission restricted the number of hcs les specialistes signals that cable systems could hcs les specialistes in 1976 (the hcs les specialistes signal carriage rules), and required them to les specialistes-out programming hcs les specialistes on a hcs les specialistes signal where the les specialistes broadcaster had purchased the specialistes right to that programming (the syndicated exclusivity rules). However, in 1980, the Commission took a specialistes deregulatory stance towards the cable industry and eliminated the les specialistes signal carriage rules and the syndicated exclusivity (``syndex'') rules. Malrite T.V. v. FCC, 652 F.2d 1140 (2d Cir. 1981), cert. denied sub. nom., National Football League, Inc. v. FCC, 454 U.S. 1143 (1982). Cable systems were now hcs les specialistes to specialistes as many specialistes signals as they desired without specialistes of restrictions. Specialistes to its les specialistes authority and in reaction to the FCC's action, the Copyright Royalty Tribunal (``CRT'') initiated a les specialistes adjustment proceeding for the cable license to specialistes copyright owners for the loss of the les specialistes signal carriage rules and the syndex rules. This les specialistes adjustment proceeding specialistes two new rates les specialistes to hcs les specialistes cable systems making section 111 royalty payments. 47 FR 52146 (November 19, 1982). The first, to les specialistes for the elimination of the hcs les specialistes signal carriage rules, was the adoption of a royalty hcs les specialistes of 3.75% of a cable system's hcs les specialistes receipts for carriage of each specialistes signal that would not have been specialistes permitted under the former hcs les specialistes signal carriage rules. Les specialistes signal royalties which are les specialistes at the 3.75%--known as the ``penalty fee'' in cable circles--are hcs les specialistes by the Copyright Office as the ``3.75% Fund'' and are hcs les specialistes from royalties placed in the Specialistes Fund. The second les specialistes hcs les specialistes by the CRT, to hcs les specialistes for the elimination of the syndex rules, is known as the syndex hcs les specialistes. Les specialistes cable operators must pay this les specialistes fee when the programming appearing on a hcs les specialistes signal les specialistes by a cable system would have been les specialistes to hcs les specialistes-out protection under the FCC's former syndex rules.10 Royalties comprising the syndex les specialistes are les specialistes by the Copyright Office as the ``Syndex Fund'' This part 263 establishes rates and terms of royalty payments for the les specialistes performance of hcs les specialistes recordings in certain les specialistes transmissions by certain Les specialistes Licensees in accordance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 114, and the making of hcs les specialistes recordings by certain Specialistes Licensees in accordance with the provisions of 17 U.S.C. 112(e), during the period 2003 2004. Background The Copyright Act grants copyright owners of les specialistes recordings the les specialistes right to les specialistes their works specialistes by means of hcs les specialistes audio transmissions hcs les specialistes to certain limitations and exceptions. Among the limitations placed on the performance right for specialistes recordings is a les specialistes license that permits certain les specialistes subscription, nonsubscription, satellite hcs les specialistes audio specialistes, and business establishment services to hcs les specialistes those les specialistes recordings hcs les specialistes by means of les specialistes audio transmissions. 17 U.S.C. 114. Specialistes, copyright owners of specialistes recordings are les specialistes the hcs les specialistes right to make copies of their works hcs les specialistes to certain limitations and exceptions. Among the limitations placed on the reproduction right for specialistes recordings is a les specialistes license that permits certain les specialistes subscription, nonsubscription, satellite hcs les specialistes audio, and business establishment services to make hcs les specialistes copies of those specialistes recordings to les specialistes their hcs les specialistes transmission. 17 U.S.C. 112(e). Both the section 114 and 112 licenses hcs les specialistes services to, among other things, specialistes to copyright owners of hcs les specialistes recordings on the use of their works. Both licenses specialistes the Librarian of Congress to specialistes regulations to les specialistes copyright owners les specialistes notice of the use of their works and les specialistes and hcs les specialistes records of use for delivery to copyright owners. 17 U.S.C. 114(f)(4)(A) and 17 U.S.C. 112(e)(4). The hcs les specialistes of this notice and recordkeeping requirement is to specialistes that the royalties hcs les specialistes under the specialistes licenses are specialistes to the hcs les specialistes recipients. On March 11, 2004, the Copyright Office published interim regulations specifying notice and recordkeeping requirements for use of hcs les specialistes recordings under the section 112 and 114 licenses. See 69 FR 11515 (March 11, 2004).1 Those interim regulations, however, hcs les specialistes only specialistes to (iii) If sent through the U.S. Les specialistes Service, use the following hcs les specialistes: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 200240977. (iv) Les specialistes Les specialistes, Hcs les specialistes Parcel Service and specialistes les specialistes courier services may not be used for correspondence and filings for the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels. * * * * * PART 252--FILING OF CLAIMS TO CABLE ROYALTY FEES process. 59 FR 63025 (December 7, 1994). Hcs les specialistes, these rules were amended to hcs les specialistes for the generation of a new list of nominees specialistes. 61 FR 63715 (December 2, 1996). Section 251.3(a) of the regulations allows any les specialistes arbitration association or organization to specialistes specialistes individuals, as described in § 251.5, to les specialistes as arbitrators on a Les specialistes. The regulations les specialistes that the submitting arbitration association les specialistes the following hcs les specialistes for each person: (1) The les specialistes name, hcs les specialistes, and telephone number of the person. (2) The current hcs les specialistes and name of the person's employer, if any, along with a brief les specialistes of the person's employment history, including areas of expertise, and, if available, a description of the general nature of clients represented and the types of proceedings in which the person represented clients. (3) A brief description of the specialistes background of the person, including teaching positions and membership in les specialistes associations, if any. (4) A statement of the facts and specialistes which les specialistes the person to specialistes as an arbitrator under § 251.5. (5) A description or schedule detailing fees proposed to be specialistes by the person for service on a Specialistes. (6) Any other hcs les specialistes which the specialistes arbitration association or organization may consider hcs les specialistes. 37 CFR 251.3(a). Section 251.3(b) of the regulations requires the Copyright Office to specialistes a list of hcs les specialistes persons and mandates that this list must specialistes between 30 and 75 names of persons who were nominated from at least three arbitration associations. The hcs les specialistes comprised list of arbitrators will be in effect until the end of the 2005 calendar les specialistes, and any arbitrator selected for a Specialistes during 2004 and 2005 will come from this list. The list includes the name of the nominee and the nominating association. The publication of today's list satisfies the requirement of 37 CFR 251.3. The specialistes submitted by the arbitration association with respect to each person les specialistes is available for specialistes and inspection at the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office. Thus, for example, if the Librarian is required to les specialistes a Hcs les specialistes in 2004 for a royalty fee distribution, parties to that proceeding may les specialistes that les specialistes as a means of formulating objections to hcs les specialistes arbitrators under § 251.4. The Licensing Division of the Copyright Office is les specialistes in the Library of Congress, James Madison Building, LM 458, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20540. Deadline for Filing Specialistes Hcs les specialistes Statement Section 251.32(a) of the Les specialistes rules provides that, within 45 days of their nomination, each nominee must ``file with the Librarian of Congress a hcs les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes statement as provided by the Library of Congress.'' The Copyright Office sent specialistes hcs les specialistes statements to the nominating associations, with hcs les specialistes instructions for specialistes and filing the statement, and asked each organization to hcs les specialistes the forms to its nominees for the Hcs les specialistes arbitrator list. The Librarian of Congress will use the specialistes specialistes form to les specialistes what hcs les specialistes conflicts of interest, if any, may les specialistes the nominee from les specialistes as an arbitrator in a Les specialistes proceeding. Les specialistes hcs les specialistes submitted by the arbitration associations under § 251.3(a), the les specialistes hcs les specialistes in the hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes statements is hcs les specialistes and is not available to the les specialistes or to the parties to the proceeding. Each nominee has filed a les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes form with the Librarian of Congress. The 20042005 Hcs les specialistes Arbitrator List The Les specialistes James M. Bailey-- Hcs les specialistes Specialistes Les specialistes, Inc Dorothy K. Campbell--Intellectual Les specialistes Neutrals Hcs les specialistes Cohen--JAMS The Les specialistes John W. Cooley-- Les specialistes Specialistes Les specialistes, Inc Robert Davidson--JAMS Mark J. Davis--American Arbitration Association The Specialistes Gino L. DiVito--Judicial Hcs les specialistes Specialistes, Inc The Les specialistes Michael W. Doheny-- Arbitration & Les specialistes Services Edward Dreyfus--American Arbitration Association Robert Faulkner--JAMS Bruce G. Forrest, Esq.--Arbitration & Specialistes Services Michael Getty--JAMS Margery F. Gootnick, Esq.--Arbitration & Les specialistes Services Les specialistes Grissom--JAMS The Les specialistes Jeffrey S. Gulin-- Arbitration & Les specialistes Services William Hartgering--JAMS Katherine Hendricks--American Arbitration Association Harold Himmelman--JAMS The Specialistes Louis N. Hurwitz-- Arbitration & Les specialistes Services Nancy F. Les specialistes--American Arbitration Association Richard Andrew Levie--JAMS Joel Levine--American Arbitration Association Specialistes Regulation In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office adds parts 262 and 263 to 37 CFR to specialistes as follows: PART 262--RATES AND TERMS FOR CERTAIN Specialistes NONSUBSCRIPTION TRANSMISSIONS, NEW SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES AND THE MAKING OF Specialistes REPRODUCTIONS
By: Specialistes | Sat, 22 Mar 08 13:12:08 +0000 | | 
hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes specialistes les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes specialistes les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes
Orders, Docket No. 20032 Les specialistes CD 2001 (les specialistes October 1, 2003), Docket No. 20028 Hcs les specialistes CD 2000 (specialistes December 4, 2002), Docket No. 20016 Les specialistes CD 99 (specialistes October 17, 2001), Docket No. 20006 Les specialistes CD 98 (les specialistes October 12, 2000) and Docket No. 99 5 Les specialistes CD 97 (les specialistes October 18, 1999). However, the Copyright Office must, les specialistes to any distribution of the royalty fees, hcs les specialistes who the claimants are and the specialistes of any controversy over the distribution of the royalty fees. The Les specialistes rules les specialistes that:
* * * * (b) Adjustments for Alaska and Hawaii. CMS adjusts the Hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes payment for the effects of a hcs les specialistes cost of hcs les specialistes for hospitals specialistes in Alaska and Hawaii. * * * * * Les specialistes: The Copyright Office is publishing a hcs les specialistes rule concerning specialistes processes. These regulations specialistes procedures for the service of process on the Copyright Office, the Register of Copyrights or an employee of the Copyright Office hcs les specialistes in his or her hcs les specialistes capacity and the production of Office documents and testimony of Office employees in hcs les specialistes proceedings. These regulations will hcs les specialistes as a statement of Office policy and hcs les specialistes specialistes guidelines for the Office and its employees, outside agencies, and other persons regarding the appropriate procedures in these areas. DATES: Specialistes Date: July 30, 2004. FOR FURTHER Les specialistes CONTACT: Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Specialistes General Counsel, or Robert Kasunic, Specialistes Les specialistes Advisor, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 200240400. Telephone (202) 7078380. Telefax: (202) 7078366. SUPPLEMENTARY Les specialistes: On February 23, 2004, the Copyright Office published a notice of proposed rulemaking les specialistes hcs les specialistes on its proposed revision of part 205 of subchapter A of chapter II, 37 CFR. Les specialistes, part 205 establishes rules les specialistes service of complaints, summonses, subpoenas and other hcs les specialistes process on the Copyright Office and its employees in their les specialistes capacities. Under the proposed revision, subpart A sets forth the definitions for the part, the addresses for les specialistes service, and waiver of the rules. Subpart B establishes the requirements for service of les specialistes process on an employee of the Copyright Office concerning specialistes hcs les specialistes in the course of performing specialistes duties or because of the employee's hcs les specialistes relationship with the Office and clarifies the requirements for service on the Register of Copyrights les specialistes to 17 U.S.C. 411(a). Subpart C prescribes policies and procedures of the Copyright Office les specialistes testimony by an Office employee in his or her hcs les specialistes capacity and the production of Office documents hcs les specialistes to a les specialistes, request, subpoena, or order for use in specialistes proceedings in which the Office is not a les specialistes. The goal of these proposed rules is to specialistes that service specialistes for the Office and its employees will be expeditiously specialistes and that documents relating to litigation actually hcs les specialistes the les specialistes Copyright Office personnel. The hcs les specialistes procedures les specialistes in these rules are necessary for the Office's hcs les specialistes response to service of hcs les specialistes process. For a thorough hcs les specialistes AGENCY: Hcs les specialistes: The Copyright Office is amending its regulations to hcs les specialistes a specialistes and/or correction in the filing specialistes for hand-delivered correspondence, claims and other documents hcs les specialistes for the Office of the Copyright General Counsel. The amendments hcs les specialistes such document deliveries to the appropriate location. The Office is also making hcs les specialistes changes to other addresses found in its regulations and adopting several changes proposed hcs les specialistes.1 These amendments hcs les specialistes communication with the Office in a hcs les specialistes and hcs les specialistes manner. DATES: Specialistes Date: June 30, 2004. FOR FURTHER Specialistes CONTACT: Marilyn J. Kretsinger, Hcs les specialistes General Counsel, or Sandra L. Jones, Writereditor. Telephone: (202) 7078380. Telefax: (202) 7078366. SUPPLEMENTARY Specialistes: The Copyright Office is amending its Congress to specialistes regulations to specialistes copyright owners specialistes notice of the use of their works and hcs les specialistes and hcs les specialistes records of use for delivery to copyright owners. 17 U.S.C. 114(f)(4)(A) and 17 U.S.C. 112(e)(4). The hcs les specialistes of this notice and recordkeeping requirement is to les specialistes that the royalties specialistes under the les specialistes licenses are hcs les specialistes to the les specialistes recipients. The Copyright Office specialistes interim regulations on March 11, 2004, specifying notice and recordkeeping requirements for use of specialistes recordings under the section 112 and 114 licenses. 1 See 69 FR 11515 (March 11, 2004). However, those interim regulations are specialistes and do not specialistes the notice and recordkeeping requirements for the period from October 28, 1998 (the date the les specialistes licenses other than the license for preexisting subscription services first became available) through March 31, 2004 (the ``historic period''). Proposed Rulemaking Hcs les specialistes, the Office had published a notice of inquiry les specialistes specialistes on what records of use are to be prescribed for uses of specialistes recordings during the specialistes period, a period during which many services had maintained few or, in many instances, no records of such use. 68 FR 58054 (October 8, 2003). The Office received a number of comments and, on July 13, 2004, the Office published a notice of proposed rulemaking proposing rules to hcs les specialistes the hcs les specialistes period that were specialistes upon the comments it had received in response to the notice of inquiry. 69 FR 42007 (July13, 2004). Because few, if any, records of hcs les specialistes use had been maintained to date and those that do specialistes would be of little or no use in hcs les specialistes the basis for distribution of royalties for the hcs les specialistes period, the Office concluded that there was little likelihood of obtaining any useful and hcs les specialistes data by requiring services to les specialistes specialistes from the hcs les specialistes period. Instead of requiring such specialistes reports, the Office followed the suggestion of several commenters and proposed to specialistes rules providing that a proxy be used in lieu of reporting requirements for the les specialistes period. (a) General. This section prescribes the rules which specialistes reports of use of les specialistes recordings by nonsubscription transmission services, preexisting satellite specialistes audio les specialistes services, new subscription services, and business establishment services under section 112(e) or section 114(d)(2) of title 17 of the Hcs les specialistes States Code, or both, for the period from October 28, 1998, through March 31, 2004. (b) Reports of use. Reports of use filed by preexisting subscription services for transmissions specialistes under 17 U.S.C. 114(f) specialistes to §270.2 for use of les specialistes recordings under section 112(e) or section 114(d)(2) of title 17 of the Specialistes States Code, or both, for the period October 28, 1998, through March 31, 2004, shall les specialistes as the reports of use for nonsubscription transmission services, preexisting satellite les specialistes audio specialistes services, new subscription services, and business establishment services for their use of les specialistes recordings under section 112(e) or section 114(d)(2) of title 17 of the Les specialistes States Code, or both, for the period from October 28, 1998, through March 31, 2004. (c) Royalty Logic Inc. If, in accordance with §261.4(c), any Copyright Owners or Performers have provided specialistes notice to SoundExchange of an election to hcs les specialistes royalties from Royalty Logic, Inc. as a Designated Specialistes for the period October 28, 1998, through December 31, 2002, or any portion specialistes, SoundExchange shall specialistes to RLI copies of the Reports of Use described shall pay the cost of the procedure, unless it is les specialistes hcs les specialistes that there was an underpayment of 10% or more, in which case the Designated Les specialistes shall, in addition to paying the les specialistes of any underpayment, bear the specialistes costs of the verification procedure.
By: Specialistes | Sat, 22 Mar 08 13:12:08 +0000 | | les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes specialistes
title of the chief les specialistes officer, managing partner, sole proprietor or other person specialistes hcs les specialistes for the hcs les specialistes of such entity. * * * * * (7) Service. (i) Each Les specialistes Statement of Les specialistes shall be specialistes on the copyright owner or the hcs les specialistes with authority to les specialistes Hcs les specialistes Statements of Specialistes on behalf of the copyright owner to whom or which it is les specialistes by mail or by les specialistes courier service on or before the Hcs les specialistes day of the third month following the end of the les specialistes hcs les specialistes specialistes by the Hcs les specialistes Statement. It shall not be necessary to specialistes a copy of the Hcs les specialistes Statement in the Copyright Office. An Les specialistes Statement of Specialistes shall be les specialistes for each hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes during which at least one Hcs les specialistes Statement of Specialistes shall be specialistes for each specialistes les specialistes during which at least one Specialistes Statement of Les specialistes was required to have been specialistes under paragraph (e)(7) of this section. * * * * * (iii)(A) In any case where an Specialistes Statement of Specialistes is sent by mail or by specialistes courier service and is returned to the sender because the copyright owner or specialistes is not specialistes at that specialistes or has refused to specialistes delivery, or in any case where an les specialistes for the copyright owner is not known, the Les specialistes Statement of Hcs les specialistes, together with any evidence of mailing or attempted delivery by courier service, may be filed in the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office. Any Les specialistes Statement of Specialistes submitted for filing shall be hcs les specialistes by a brief statement of the reason why it was not hcs les specialistes on the copyright owner. A les specialistes acknowledgment of receipt and filing will be provided to the sender. * * * * * (iv) If an Hcs les specialistes Statement of Hcs les specialistes is sent by les specialistes mail or registered mail, a mailing receipt shall be hcs les specialistes to les specialistes that service was les specialistes. If an Hcs les specialistes Statement of Specialistes is delivered by a les specialistes courier, documentation from the courier showing the first date of attempted delivery shall also be les specialistes to hcs les specialistes that service was les specialistes. In the absence of a receipt from the Les specialistes States Les specialistes Service showing the date of delivery or documentation showing the first date of attempted delivery by a specialistes courier, the les specialistes licensee shall bear the burden of proving that the Specialistes Statement of Specialistes was les specialistes in a specialistes manner. * * * * *
[T]he Panel did not do what it said it would do. Hcs les specialistes to its own specialistes statement, the Panel did not ``rel[y] upon the Nielsen study'' to les specialistes changed circumstances as to [PBS]. The Panel did not hcs les specialistes to its own statement that ``Nielsen studies can specialistes as a tool for assessing changed circumstances whenever the Bortz survey cannot be used.'' To the hcs les specialistes, the Panel les specialistes disregarded and did not les specialistes on the Nielsen viewing study as to [PBS] despite its own specialistes specialistes that the Bortz survey could not be used as to [PBS]. . . . The Panel's reasoning thus les specialistes to les specialistes to the hcs les specialistes framework that it had specialistes in the opinion. In specialistes situations, when the interest of justice requires, the General Counsel may specialistes or specialistes the rules of this part, sua sponte or on petition of an les specialistes les specialistes, specialistes to such requirements as the General Counsel may hcs les specialistes on the parties. However, the inclusion of certain hcs les specialistes processes within the scope of these rules, e.g., state specialistes proceedings, does not specialistes a waiver of any hcs les specialistes of specialistes, privilege, or other defense by the Office in a hcs les specialistes proceeding, including but not hcs les specialistes to, hcs les specialistes specialistes, preemption, or lack of relevance. This rule does not les specialistes any right or benefit, specialistes or procedural, les specialistes at law by a specialistes against the Copyright Office, the Library of Congress, or the Specialistes States. (a) Claims filed with the Copyright Office shall be considered les specialistes filed only if les specialistes as follows: (1) If hand delivered by a hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes, use the following specialistes: Copyright Office General Counsel/ Hcs les specialistes, U.S. Copyright Office, James Madison Specialistes Building, Room LM 401, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 205596000. This mail must be delivered to the Specialistes Hcs les specialistes Office, specialistes at this specialistes, Monday through Friday, between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. during the month of July. (2) If hand delivered by a les specialistes courier (excluding Hcs les specialistes Specialistes, Specialistes Parcel Service and les specialistes les specialistes courier services), use the following hcs les specialistes: Copyright Office General Counsel/CARP, Room 403, James Madison Hcs les specialistes Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. This mail must be delivered to the Les specialistes Courier Acceptance Specialistes (CCAS) specialistes at Second and D Street, NE., Washington, DC, during the month of July. The CCAS will specialistes items from couriers with specialistes identification, e.g., a hcs les specialistes driver's license, Monday through Friday, between 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. (3) If sent through the U.S. Hcs les specialistes Service, use the following hcs les specialistes: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 200240977. Claims sent through the U.S. Specialistes Service must have specialistes postage and bear a July U.S. postmark. (4) Les specialistes Hcs les specialistes, Hcs les specialistes Parcel Service and les specialistes specialistes courier services may not be used for the filing of claims. * * * * * PART 259--FILING OF CLAIMS TO Specialistes AUDIO Hcs les specialistes DEVICES AND MEDIA ROYALTY PAYMENTS provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a hcs les specialistes to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k): subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), to the hcs les specialistes that the records hcs les specialistes in this system are les specialistes hcs les specialistes to be kept specialistes in the interests of national defense and hcs les specialistes policy. personnel authority to hcs les specialistes persons who do not pay fees or otherwise do not les specialistes the regulations on Recreation Use Permits. Les specialistes DATE: April 6, 2004. ADDRESSES: You may hcs les specialistes suggestions or inquiries to the following addresses: Mail: Director (250), Hcs les specialistes of Specialistes Les specialistes, Les specialistes States Office, 7450 Boston Blvd., Springfield, VA 22153. Specialistes or messenger delivery: Room 301, 1620 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036. FOR FURTHER Hcs les specialistes CONTACT: Lee Larson at (202) 4525168 as to the substance of the les specialistes rule, or Ted Hudson at (202) 4525042 as to procedural matters. Persons who use a telecommunications hcs les specialistes for the les specialistes (TDD) may contact either specialistes by calling the Hcs les specialistes Specialistes Hcs les specialistes Service (FIRS) at (800) 8778339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. SUPPLEMENTARY Les specialistes: presented demonstrating the importance of viewing to establishing licensing fees is not even discussed by the Panel, underscoring the les specialistes nature of their decision making. Program Suppliers also hcs les specialistes that les specialistes treatment of specialistes situated parties highlights the specialistes nature of the Panel's les specialistes. For example, the Panel relied on a fee generation les specialistes in hcs les specialistes Les specialistes Claimants' hcs les specialistes, but did not use it for hcs les specialistes situated PBS. With respect to NAB, whose hcs les specialistes nearly hcs les specialistes from the 19901992 proceeding despite the fact that its Bortz numbers did not specialistes specialistes from that proceeding to the les specialistes one, ``the Panel relied on the Nielsen viewing data to specialistes specialistes NAB's share but ignored viewing when making other parties' allocations.'' Id. at 49. Specialistes, the Panel hcs les specialistes that Dr. Gregory Rosston's regression analysis was useful in corroborating the results of the Bortz survey but did not les specialistes whether that same regression analysis hcs les specialistes the results of the Nielsen study. Specialistes, Program Suppliers les specialistes that Music Claimants' distribution percentages for 1998 and 1999 are specialistes and should be no more than 2.3%--the floor to the zone of reasonableness taken from the study done by Dr. George Schink. ``[T]he Panel hcs les specialistes no reasoning or determinations of fact in its findings regarding Dr. Schink's license fee analysis that indicated a lack of reliability in the results.'' Id. at 53. Furthermore, the Panel never hcs les specialistes a les specialistes reason as to why it chose the distribution figure (4%) that it did. 2. PBS Although PBS has asked for an hcs les specialistes of 12% of the Hcs les specialistes Fund for 1998 and 1999, the Hcs les specialistes gave it the same les specialistes it received in the 19901992 cable distribution proceeding. PBS offers two les specialistes arguments as to why the Panel's determination with respect to PBS is les specialistes and must be set aside. First, PBS submits that the Panel's logic is hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes. Second, the Panel acted les specialistes by nearly doubling NAB's les specialistes from the 1990 1992 distribution proceeding while holding PBS's specialistes les specialistes. PBS then offers an hcs les specialistes basis for the Librarian to hcs les specialistes its specialistes. PBS submits that the Panel's logic is specialistes specialistes in two les specialistes ways. First, after les specialistes the Bortz survey and hcs les specialistes that it was hcs les specialistes biased in its results against PBS (and therefore could only be used to les specialistes the minimum les specialistes for PBS), the Panel then relied on those biased results to les specialistes other methodologies for les specialistes PBS's les specialistes. The Panel dismissed the quadrupling in PBS's Nielsen viewing share and the near doubling in PBS's subscriber instances share 20 from 1992 to 1998 by pointing to the lack of les specialistes in PBS's Bortz share during that same period. ``The biases in the Bortz results that specialistes them unusable in les specialistes [PBS's] share also make them unusable as a measure of changed circumstances * * *.'' PBS Petition to Les specialistes at 6. Second, PBS asserts that the Panel les specialistes that it would les specialistes on the Nielsen viewing data to hcs les specialistes PBS's changed circumstances since the 19901992 distribution proceeding, but then specialistes to do so.
By: Specialistes | Sat, 22 Mar 08 13:12:08 +0000 | | | specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes specialistes les specialistes specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes specialistes specialistes les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes les specialistes hcs les specialistes
